Water

Conserve water with plumbing and nudges

  • Allcott, H. & Greenstone, M. Are there energy efficiency gaps? J. Economics. perspective. 263-28 (2012).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Gillingham, K., Keyes, A., and Palmer, K. Evaluating Progress in Energy Efficiency Policies and Programs. Annu. Pastor Resources. economy. 10511–532 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Graff Zivin, J. and Novan, K. Improving Efficiency and Behavior: Electricity Savings in Residential Weathering Programs. Energy J. 371-23 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Allcott, H. & Greenstone, M. Measuring the Welfare Effects of Residential Energy Efficiency Programs Working Paper No. 23386 (NBER, 2017); https://doi.org/10.3386/w23386

  • Fowlie, M., Greenstone, M. and Wolfram, C. Are energy efficiency investments achievable? Evidence from the Weathering Assistance Program. QJ economy. 1331597–1644 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Liang, J. et al. Does energy retrofit work? Evidence from commercial and residential buildings in Phoenix. J. About. economy. manage. 92726–743 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Davis, LW, Fuchs, A. & Gertler, P. Cash for Coolers: Evaluating a large-scale appliance replacement program in Mexico. Yes. economy. J. Economics.policy 6207–238 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Jacobsen, GD & Kotchen, MJ Are building codes effective in saving energy? Evidence from Florida residential billing data. Pastoral economy. statistics. 9534–49 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Levinson, A. How much energy can a building energy code save? Evidence from California homes. Yes. economy. Priest. 1062867–2894 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Qiu, Y. & Kahn, ME Using High Frequency Data to Better Assess Green Building Sustainability. Nat. support. 1642–649 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Novan, K., Smith, A. and Zhou, T. Residential building codes do save energy: Evidence from hourly smart meter data. Pastoral economy.statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00967 (2020).

  • Kotchen, MJ Long-term evidence on whether building energy codes reduce residential energy consumption. J. Associate Professor. about. resource. economy. 4135–153 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  • Mayer, PW, DeOreo, WB, Towler, E. & Lewis, DM Residential Indoor Water Conservation Study: Retrofit Evaluation of Efficient Indoor Plumbing Installations for Single-Family Homes in the Service Area of ​​the East Bay Municipal Utility District, Aquacraft, Inc. Water Engineering and Management (2003).

  • Water efficient plumbing fixtures reduce water usage and wastewater flow (US General Accounting Firm, 2000); https://www.gao.gov/assets/rced-00-232.pdf

  • Residential End Uses of Water (Water Research Foundation, 2016); https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/WRF_REU2016.pdf

  • Price, JI, Chermak, JM & Felardo, J. Low Flow Equipment and Domestic Water Demand: An Evaluation of Demand Side Management Policies in Albuquerque, New Mexico. J. About. manage. 13337–44 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Bennear, LS, Lee, JM & Taylor, LO Municipal Environmental Retrofit Rebate Program: Additionality and Cost-Benefit Assessment. J. Policy Analysis. manage. 32350–372 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Allcott, H. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Economy. 951082–1095 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Brent, DA, Cook, JH & Olsen, S. Social comparison, household water use, and participation in utility conservation programs: Evidence from three randomized trials. J. Associate Professor. about. resource. economy. 2597–627 (2015).

    Google Scholar

  • Jessoe, K., Lade, GE, Loge, F. & Spang, E. Spillover Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence for Water and Energy Use. J. Associate Professor. about. resource. economy. 8315–346 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Andor, MA & Fels, KM Behavioural economics and energy conservation – a systematic review of nonprice interventions and their causal effects. ecology. economy. 148178–210 (2018).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Ferraro, PJ, Miranda, JJ & Price, MK Persistence of treatment effects of norm-based policy instruments: Evidence from randomized environmental policy experiments. Yes. economy. Priest. 101318–322 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Bernedo, M., Ferraro, PJ & Price, M. The ongoing impact of norm-based messaging and its implications for water conservation. J. Consumption.policy 37437–452 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Ferraro, PJ & Price, MK Using non-monetary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Pastoral economy. statistics. 9564–73 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Allcott, H. & Rogers, T. Short- and long-term effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence for energy conservation. Yes. economy. Priest. 1043003–3037 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Newell, RG & Siikamäki, J. Driving energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels. J. Associate Professor. about. resource. economy. 1555–598 (2014).

    Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, B. and Graff Zivin, J. Dynamic saliency of intermittent billing: Evidence from smart meters. J. Economics. behavior. organ. 107176–190 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Jessoe, K. & Rapson, D. Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. Yes. economy. Priest. 1041417–1438 (2014).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Wichman, CJ Information provision and consumer behavior: A natural experiment in billing frequency. J. Public Economy. 15213–33 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Costa, DL and Kahn, ME Energy-saving “boosts” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from random residential electricity field experiments. J. Euro. economy. Associate Professor. 11680–702 (2013).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Allcott, H. & Kessler, JB The welfare effects of boosting: A case study of social comparisons of energy use. Yes. economy. J. Application. economy. 11236–276 (2019).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Sunstein, CR Distributive effects of nudges. Nat. Humph.behavior. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01236-z (2021).

  • Allcott, H. Site Selection Bias in Project Evaluation. QJ economy. 1301117–1165 (2015).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Nudge without nudge. Nat. Humph.behavior. 4121 (2020).

  • water sense (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2021); https://www.epa.gov/watersense/watersense-products

  • Hanna, R., Duflo, E., and Greenstone, M. Smoke: The impact of household behavior on the long-term effects of improved stoves. Yes. economy. J. Economics.policy 880–114 (2016).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Mideksa, TK & Kallbekken, S. The impact of climate change on electricity markets: a review. Energy policy 383579–3585 (2010).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Deschê​​nes, O. & Greenstone, M. Climate change, mortality, and adaptation: Evidence from annual fluctuations in weather in the United States. Yes. economy. J. Application. economy. 3152–185 (2011).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Agarwal, S., Sing, TF & Yang, Y. Impact of cross-border haze pollution on household utility consumption. energy economy. 85104591 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Schultz, PW, Nolan, JM, Cialdini, RB, Goldstein, NJ & Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and rebuilding power of social norms. psychology. science. 18429–434 (2007).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Brent, DA et al. What Causes Different Responses to Socially Comparative Information on Water Conservation? about. resource. economy. 77503–537 (2020).

    Article Google Scholar

  • Agarwal, S., Rengarajan, S., Sing, TF & Yang, Y. Schoolchildren and the push for electricity conservation: Evidence from the Singapore Zero Carbon Initiative campaign. energy economy. 6129–41 (2017).

    Article Google Scholar

    About the author

    Nkinfoweb

    Leave a Comment